Miscellaneous 2006

Practical application and implementation of CGT small business concessions

Source: TAS

Published Date: 6 Oct 2006

 

In the recent Federal Budget changes arising from the Board of Taxation’s post implementation review of the small business CGT concessions were announced, together with a new significant stakeholder test. This presentation re-examines the small business CGT concessions from a practical perspective, highlighting some of the proposed changes and considering the traps that practitioners must continue to monitor. The presentation considers:

  • can a taxpayer’s structure result in a failure to satisfy the threshold tests?
  • is there an active asset?
  • what does need to be included in the maximum net asset value test?
  • how does the connection test operate?
  • what are the compliance traps?
  • what are the implications of choosing some concessions over others?
This was also presented by Ron Jorgensen on 21 Octobe 2006 at the Tasmanian State Convention.

Sorry, this content is for members only.

To get access to this and 25,000 other premium articles, books, videos and webinars sign up toour members program.

Already a Member? Login Now

Already a Member? Login Now

Individual Session

CGT small business concessions - selected issues

Author(s): Ron Jorgensen , Daniel Smedley

Details

  • Published By: Daniel Smedley
  • Published On:6 Oct 2006
  • Took place at:Doherty St. Helens Resort

The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study,

research critisism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be rerpoduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.

Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

This material is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study., research, critisism or review, as permitted under teh copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.

Unless expressly stated, opininons are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

Tags

Miscellaneous 2006

Share this page