2009

Tax implications of failed Managed Investment Scheme arrangements

Source: South Australia

Published Date: 15 Sep 2009

 
This event, part of the Bi-Monthly Briefing series, covered Managed Investment Scheme arrangements.

Use of Managed Investment Scheme (MIS) arrangements for forestry and non-forestry agribusiness projects has seen significant growth in the last 10 years, particularly in relation to the perceived tax benefits of using these structures. However, what are the tax implications where the Responsible Entity/Manager fails or the MIS arrangement is wound up?

This event considered the tax implications for Investors/Growers where the Responsible Entity/Manager is replaced or the Scheme is restructured or wound up. The event also highlighted the surprising different tax results for forestry versus non-forestry failed MIS agribusiness projects.

Tax update

Author(s): Alex Demetriou
Materials from this session:

Managed investment schemes

Author(s): Catherine Frawley
Materials from this session:

Details

  • Published On:15 Sep 2009
  • Took place at:Education Development Centre, Hindmarsh

The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study,

research critisism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be rerpoduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.

Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

This material is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study., research, critisism or review, as permitted under teh copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.

Unless expressly stated, opininons are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

Tags

2009

Share this page