2010

Unpaid Present Entitlements - What you need to know before 30 June 2010

Source: South Australia

Published Date: 24 Jun 2010

 
On 2 June 2010, the Tax Office released Taxation Ruling TR 2010/3, the finalised version of the controversial draft TR 2009/D8 on the tax treatment of unpaid present entitlements (UPE) for corporate beneficiaries. The ruling raises exceptionally complex trust and tax law issues which will have hard practical consequences for trustees, beneficiaries and their advisers, some of which need to be considered before 30 June 2010. Although the final ruling is "better' for taxpayers in some respects dangers still abound for taxpayers and their advisors who utilise corporate beneficiaries. The ruling has both retrospective and prospective application depending on what technical issues are seen to be involved.

This seminar provided guidance to tax practitioners on what this new approach means in practice.

The corresponding paper was written by Greg Travers and delivered in Sydney on 23 June 2010, his paper can be downloaded there.

Ian Snook's presentation was also delivered in Darwin on the 6th August 2010 at UPE & Superannuation coming to Darwin.

Unpaid present entitlements - What you need to know before 30 June 2010

Author(s): Ian Snook

Details

  • Published On:24 Jun 2010
  • Took place at:Hotel Grand Chancellor, Adelaide

The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study,

research critisism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be rerpoduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.

Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

This material is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study., research, critisism or review, as permitted under teh copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.

Unless expressly stated, opininons are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

Tags

2010

Share this page