maintenance

Become a Member
Resources
Insights
Events
Education
Membership
About us
Contact us
  Litigation 2011

Tax audits Lessons from Wickenby

Source: Western Australia

Published Date: 11 Aug 2011

 

Sorry, this content is for members only.

To get access to this and 25,000 other premium articles, books, videos and webinars sign up toour members program.

Already a Member? Login Now

Subscribe Now

Already a Member? Login Now

This paper covers:

  • targeting audits
  • ATO attitudes
  • adviser attitudes
  • objection review
  • ADR approaches
  • settlements
  • section 167
  • burden of proof
  • time running
  • legal professional privilege
  • tax advice document privilege
  • without prejudice communications
  • administrative penalties
  • interest
  • bankruptcy and tax disputes
  • disputes and criminal proceedings
  • victims of Wickenby.

Please note Ken's paper has been updated since it was originally delivered and was presented at Tax Audit Survival event in South Australia on the 8th of November.

Author(s)

Individual Session

Tax audits - Lessons from Wickenby

Author(s): Ken Schurgott
Materials from this session:

Download

Details

  • Published By: Ken Schurgott
  • Published On:11 Aug 2011
  • Took place at:Quay West Resort, Bunker Bay

The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study,

research critisism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be rerpoduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.

Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

This material is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study., research, critisism or review, as permitted under teh copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.

Unless expressly stated, opininons are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

Tags

Litigation 2011

Share this page